← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Stapley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-23 Country: Canada
2018 NHL Draft Round 6, Pick #190  ·  Montreal Canadiens Montreal Canadiens
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Vernon Vipers BCHL 49 4 8 12 0.245 0.0912 0.1018 0.3568 0.3981
2016-17 Vernon Vipers BCHL 52 16 34 50 0.962 0.3582 0.3814 1.4010 1.4917
2017-18 Vernon Vipers BCHL 52 27 32 59 1.135 0.4226 0.4296 1.6532 1.6807
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Denver D1 NCHC SR 41 18 25 43 1.049
2020-21 Denver D1 NCHC JR 13 4 3 7 0.538
2019-20 Denver D1 NCHC SO 35 5 25 30 0.857
2018-19 Denver D1 NCHC FR 32 5 14 19 0.594
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2018-19 · Denver
+69.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13354
Forward overall
#606
Forward born in 1999
#538
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Boston College (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.