IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Sandhu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-13 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of British Columbia · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 44 5 35 40 0.909 0.3503 0.3947 1.3230 1.4905
2016-17 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 53 10 20 30 0.566 0.2181 0.2346 0.8237 0.8859
2017-18 Vernon Vipers BCHL 51 10 21 31 0.608 0.2342 0.2406 0.8845 0.9088
2022-23 Univ. of British Columbia USports-M 25 5 7 12 0.480 0.2532 0.2477 1.4069 1.3765
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Arizona State D1 NCHC SR 26 2 3 5 0.192
2020-21 Arizona State D1 NCHC JR 26 2 5 7 0.269
2019-20 Arizona State D1 NCHC SO 36 5 13 18 0.500
2018-19 Arizona State D1 NCHC FR 35 3 11 14 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2018-19 · Arizona State
+96.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22780
Forward overall
#1125
Forward born in 1999

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2017-18
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Liscio
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.