IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Zieky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 — BCHL 55 28 26 54 0.982 0.3657 0.3547 1.4306 1.3875
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 RPI D1 ECAC SR 34 7 16 23 0.676
2019-20 Rensselaer D1 — SR 34 7 16 23 0.676
2018-19 RPI D1 ECAC JR 21 8 6 14 0.667
2018-19 Rensselaer D1 — JR 21 8 6 14 0.667
2017-18 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 4 0 1 1 0.250
2016-17 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#10679
Forward overall
#450
Forward born in 1996
#368
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brady Lindauer
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2018-19
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Shade
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.407 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gabe Randel
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.