← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Lindauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0525 0.0547 0.1508 0.1571
2018-19 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 46 59 75 134 2.913 0.3656 0.3580 0.9196 0.9004
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 25 7 6 13 0.520
2021-22 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 23 5 11 16 0.696
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC SO 9 3 8 11 1.222
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 9 3 8 11 1.222
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC FR 21 4 6 10 0.476
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 21 4 6 10 0.476
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2019-20 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+135.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
55%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4419
Forward overall
#180
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2005-06
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2003-04
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.