IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Halloran Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-13 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Straubing Tigers · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 53 21 24 45 0.849 0.3272 0.3359 1.2357 1.2687
2021-22 SaiPa Liiga 25 7 10 17 0.680 1.7000 1.7730 5.8453 6.0961
2022-23 Timrå IK SHL 27 7 8 15 0.556 1.3890 1.5010 7.2498 7.8343
2023-24 Tappara Liiga 60 19 24 43 0.717 1.7917 1.7720 6.1608 6.0932
2024-25 Tappara Liiga 59 13 30 43 0.729 1.8220 1.7384 6.2648 5.9773
2025-26 Straubing Tigers DEL 52 22 36 58 1.115 2.7885 3.0792 9.4566 10.4426
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 33 12 18 30 0.909
2018-19 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 20 4 9 13 0.650
2017-18 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 37 19 26 45 1.216
2016-17 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 29 5 4 9 0.310
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2016-17 · Colorado College
+7.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 16 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#401
Forward overall
#19
Forward born in 1997

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.