← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Sillinger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 SJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 BCHL 58 16 29 45 0.776 0.2990 0.3124 1.1292 1.1799
2016-17 BCHL 57 17 24 41 0.719 0.2771 0.2754 1.0468 1.0403
2017-18 BCHL 56 33 34 67 1.196 0.4610 0.4360 1.7411 1.6466
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SR 39 17 30 47 1.205
2020-21 Bemidji State D1 WCHA JR 20 10 5 15 0.750
2019-20 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SO 37 14 20 34 0.919
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 WCHA FR 38 10 9 19 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2018-19 · Bemidji State
+57.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11927
Forward overall
#537
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2024-25
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.