← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Baker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 50 12 11 23 0.460 0.1772 0.1800 0.6690 0.6795
2016-17 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 58 27 35 62 1.069 0.4119 0.3973 1.5548 1.4996
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 UMass D1 HockeyEast — 19 1 2 3 0.158
2020-21 Dartmouth D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Dartmouth D1 ECAC JR 31 6 18 24 0.774
2018-19 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 32 4 11 15 0.469
2017-18 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 33 9 8 17 0.515
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2017-18 · Dartmouth
+93.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15929
Forward overall
#716
Forward born in 1997
#631
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2012-13
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.