IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Finner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 55 2 5 7 0.127 0.0490 0.0497 0.1853 0.1878
2016-17 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 31 10 15 25 0.806 0.3107 0.2990 1.1737 1.1295
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Ferris State D1 WCHA SR 21 2 9 11 0.524
2019-20 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 5 4 0 4 0.800
2018-19 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 26 6 5 11 0.423
2017-18 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 28 5 9 14 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2017-18 · Ferris State
+193.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28989
Forward overall
#1327
Forward born in 1997
#1579
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gavin Bloder
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Malkmus
Finlandia · 2013-14
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Olsson
Endicott · 2014-15
1.364 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.