IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan De Jong Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-12 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Mora IK · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 9 0 2 2 0.222 0.0856 0.0971 0.3232 0.3668
2016-17 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 43 5 25 30 0.698 0.2688 0.2913 1.0147 1.0996
2017-18 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 50 17 46 63 1.260 0.4855 0.5028 1.8325 1.8978
2025-26 Mora IK Allsvenskan 51 17 17 34 0.667 1.6667 1.7266 6.2516 6.4763
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 41 19 21 40 0.976
2021-22 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 42 11 21 32 0.762
2020-21 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 29 14 15 29 1.000
2019-20 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 34 7 11 18 0.529
2018-19 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 38 10 15 25 0.658
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.66
2018-19 · Quinnipiac
+83.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#1669
Forward overall
#67
Forward born in 1999

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.