← New Search ↗ Social Card

Karter McNarland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 57 10 40 50 0.877 0.2247 0.2247 0.6501 0.6501
2020-21 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 9 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Powell River Kings BCHL 49 8 20 28 0.571 0.2202 0.2225 0.8326 0.8412
2022-23 Powell River Kings BCHL 54 16 31 47 0.870 0.3354 0.3224 1.2683 1.2192
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 33 4 17 21 0.636
2024-25 Alaska Anchorage D1 JR 23 2 4 6 0.261
2023-24 Alaska Anchorage D1 SO 16 3 5 8 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2023-24 · Alaska Anchorage
+106.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18101
Forward overall
#922
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.