← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Stevenson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Penticton Vees BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 33 10 10 20 0.606 0.2335 0.2473 0.8821 0.9342
2017-18 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 40 12 11 23 0.575 0.2215 0.2239 0.8368 0.8460
2018-19 BCHL 57 19 34 53 0.930 0.3583 0.3429 1.3531 1.2950
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast 15 4 0 4 0.267
2022-23 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SR 35 12 8 20 0.571
2021-22 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 33 4 1 5 0.151
2020-21 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 24 4 6 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2019-20 · New Hampshire
+64.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18372
Forward overall
#892
Forward born in 1999
#831
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2024-25
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.