← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rhett Kingston Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-11-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 4 1 2 3 0.750 0.1921 0.2130 0.5647 0.6262
2015-16 — AJHL 28 6 8 14 0.500 0.1677 0.1754 0.4626 0.4839
2016-17 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 55 16 14 30 0.545 0.2102 0.2101 0.7934 0.7930
2017-18 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 54 24 26 50 0.926 0.3567 0.3394 1.3466 1.2812
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Western Michigan D1 NCHC — 10 1 0 1 0.100
2020-21 Western Michigan D1 NCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 33 9 8 17 0.515
2018-19 Western Michigan D1 NCHC FR 13 2 1 3 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2018-19 · Western Michigan
-6.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20701
Forward overall
#941
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2024-25
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2015-16
1.381 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.