← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Crozier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 58 6 22 28 0.483 0.1619 0.1793 0.4467 0.4948
2015-16 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 34 7 24 31 0.912 0.3058 0.3245 0.8436 0.8953
2016-17 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 53 10 19 29 0.547 0.2108 0.2139 0.7958 0.8075
2017-18 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 52 20 36 56 1.077 0.4149 0.4011 1.5662 1.5140
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast — 38 2 9 11 0.289
2021-22 Brown D1 ECAC — 26 6 9 15 0.577
2020-21 Brown D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Brown D1 ECAC SO 19 2 4 6 0.316
2018-19 Brown D1 ECAC FR 34 4 15 19 0.559
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2018-19 · Brown
+100.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14990
Forward overall
#689
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2012-13
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.