IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonny Tychonick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-03-03 Country: Canada
2018 NHL Draft Round 2, Pick #48  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
Signed Professionally
Djurgårdens IF · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.2212 0.2571 0.6179 0.7183
2016-17 Penticton Vees BCHL 48 3 20 23 0.479 0.1785 0.1992 0.6982 0.7791
2017-18 Penticton Vees BCHL 48 9 38 47 0.979 0.3648 0.3895 1.4268 1.5236
2024-25 Djurgårdens IF Allsvenskan 50 6 16 22 0.440 1.1000 1.1414 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 35 8 18 26 0.743
2021-22 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 24 2 6 8 0.333
2020-21 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC JR 23 3 5 8 0.348
2019-20 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 24 4 7 11 0.458
2018-19 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 28 0 4 4 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2018-19 · North Dakota
-51.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#686
Defenseman overall
#135
Defenseman born in 2000

D2/3 Comparables

Nolan Redler
UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Dougherty
Western New England · 2018-19
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Collin Patterson
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.