← New Search ↗ Social Card

Harrison Blaisdell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-18 Country: Canada
2019 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #134  ·  Winnipeg Jets Winnipeg Jets
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 49 9 12 21 0.429 0.1597 0.1788 0.6245 0.6994
2018-19 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 51 33 25 58 1.137 0.4236 0.4515 1.6572 1.7664
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast 32 11 3 14 0.438
2022-23 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast 32 1 3 4 0.125
2021-22 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast 25 2 6 8 0.320
2020-21 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 19 0 4 4 0.210
2019-20 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 32 2 10 12 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2019-20 · North Dakota
+27.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14327
Forward overall
#641
Forward born in 2001
#602
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2010-11
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.