← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron MacDonald Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Powell River Kings BCHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.1926 0.2250 0.7277 0.8503
2018-19 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Vernon Vipers BCHL 56 15 10 25 0.446 0.1720 0.1720 0.6496 0.6496
2020-21 Vernon Vipers BCHL 20 5 9 14 0.700 0.2697 0.2697 1.0187 1.0187
2021-22 Vernon Vipers BCHL 28 15 19 34 1.214 0.4679 0.4510 1.7672 1.7034
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SR 34 6 16 22 0.647
2024-25 Dartmouth D1 ECAC JR 33 6 10 16 0.485
2023-24 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 31 4 9 13 0.419
2022-23 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 30 1 7 8 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2022-23 · Dartmouth
-13.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13868
Forward overall
#702
Forward born in 2002
#510
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2015-16
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.