← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Dangos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 40 3 13 16 0.400 0.0510 0.0571 0.1265 0.1417
2019-20 Janesville Jets NAHL 40 2 6 8 0.200 0.0735 0.0735 0.2114 0.2114
2020-21 Janesville Jets NAHL 36 2 8 10 0.278 0.1021 0.1021 0.2936 0.2936
2021-22 Madison Capitols USHL 59 2 21 23 0.390 0.2299 0.2181 1.1697 1.1099
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA SR 31 0 3 3 0.097
2024-25 American International D1 AHA — 33 1 2 3 0.091
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 AHA — 19 1 3 4 0.210
2022-23 Arizona State D1 NCHC — 20 0 1 1 0.050
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2022-23 · Arizona State
-65.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9756
Defenseman overall
#2121
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2009-10
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.