← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitchel Deelstra Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 57 20 15 35 0.614 0.2366 0.2324 0.8936 0.8776
2019-20 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 56 25 21 46 0.821 0.3165 0.3165 1.1954 1.1954
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Robert Morris D1 AHA 35 12 5 17 0.486
2023-24 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 25 1 2 3 0.120
2022-23 Ferris State D1 CCHA 34 7 6 13 0.382
2021-22 Ferris State D1 CCHA 28 4 8 12 0.429
2020-21 Ferris State D1 WCHA 25 7 4 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2020-21 · Ferris State
+121.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18672
Forward overall
#908
Forward born in 1999
#858
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2004-05
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.