← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dimitri Mikrogiannakis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-09-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Milton Menace OJHL 42 2 4 6 0.143 0.0350 0.0378 0.0984 0.1062
2017-18 Milton Menace OJHL 48 9 17 26 0.542 0.1328 0.1370 0.3730 0.3848
2018-19 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 54 6 21 27 0.500 0.1926 0.1909 0.7277 0.7214
2019-20 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 58 7 39 46 0.793 0.3056 0.3056 1.1542 1.1542
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 RIT D1 AHA GR 30 4 7 11 0.367
2023-24 RIT D1 AHA SR 40 2 7 9 0.225
2022-23 RIT D1 AHA JR 28 4 6 10 0.357
2021-22 RIT D1 AHA SO 36 1 4 5 0.139
2020-21 RIT D1 AHA FR 18 0 3 3 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2020-21 · RIT
+4.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5311
Defenseman overall
#1193
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2010-11
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2001-02
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.