IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Niedermayer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Penticton Vees BCHL 36 2 4 6 0.167 0.0621 0.0661 0.2429 0.2587
2019-20 Penticton Vees BCHL 52 23 22 45 0.865 0.3224 0.3224 1.2610 1.2610
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SR 32 5 12 17 0.531
2024-25 Bowling Green D1 CCHA — 33 2 6 8 0.242
2023-24 Arizona State D1 NCHC — 33 9 4 13 0.394
2022-23 Arizona State D1 NCHC — 7 1 2 3 0.429
2021-22 Arizona State D1 — — 19 3 0 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2021-22 · Arizona State
+153.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5802
Defenseman overall
#1312
Defenseman born in 2001
#1553
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Christian Wolanin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Hamilton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Savage
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Dorantes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matej Palfy
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Zarudny
SUNY Geneseo · 2018-19
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dave Gervais
Neumann · 2006-07
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.