IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Kelley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Jamestown Ironmen NAHL 22 7 4 11 0.500 0.1837 0.1973 0.5284 0.5676
2012-13 — NAHL 40 0 5 5 0.125 0.0459 0.0470 0.1321 0.1353
2013-14 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 52 12 19 31 0.596 0.2190 0.2133 0.6301 0.6136
2014-15 — NAHL 57 9 13 22 0.386 0.1418 0.1306 0.4080 0.3759
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Nichols D3 CNE — 25 4 6 10 0.400
2015-16 Nichols D3 CNE — 27 6 8 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2015-16 · Nichols
+270.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35842
Forward overall
#1396
Forward born in 1994
#3600
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael McChesney
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex O'Dowd
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Crivello
Nichols · 2015-16
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.