Tanner Komzak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-30 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2019-20	Langley Rivermen	BCHL	38	1	3	4	0.105	0.0406	0.0406	0.1532	0.1532
2020-21	Cowichan Valley Capitals	BCHL	20	4	4	8	0.400	0.1541	0.1541	0.5821	0.5821
2021-22	Whitecourt Wolverines	AJHL	58	2	6	8	0.138	0.0463	0.0453	0.1276	0.1250
2022-23	Whitecourt Wolverines	AJHL	60	12	40	52	0.867	0.2907	0.2703	0.8020	0.7456
2025-26	Mount Royal Univ.	USports-M	24	1	10	11	0.458	0.2418	0.2369	1.3433	1.3163

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2024-25	North Dakota	D1	NCHC	—	17	0	0	0	0.000
2023-24	North Dakota	D1	NCHC	—	4	0	0	0	0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

98%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6008

Defenseman overall

#1467

Defenseman born in 2002

D2/3 Comparables

Kelly Wosnack

St. Norbert · 2001-02

0.909 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Kailin Chen

UMass Dartmouth · 2024-25

1.454 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Chad Anderson

Norwich · 2006-07

1.000 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.