IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kelly Wosnack Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-01-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 63 25 19 44 0.698 0.2333 0.2221 0.6483 0.6172
2001-02 Fort Saskatchewan Traders AJHL 60 43 44 87 1.450 0.4843 0.4375 1.3460 1.2160
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 St. Norbert D3 — SR 21 0 12 12 0.571
2004-05 St. Norbert D3 — JR 24 9 14 23 0.958
2003-04 St. Norbert D3 — SO 29 13 22 35 1.207
2002-03 St. Norbert D3 — FR 22 10 10 20 0.909
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.91
2002-03 · St. Norbert
+202.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6111
Forward overall
#262
Forward born in 1981
#125
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Daniel Eruzione
Salve Regina · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Peters
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Seltenreich
New England · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.