IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tucker Hartmann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Marks NE-Prep 28 1 17 18 0.643 0.1274 0.1274 0.2929 0.2929
2019-20 St. Marks NE-Prep 22 3 18 21 0.955 0.1891 0.1891 0.4349 0.4349
2020-21 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 20 3 9 12 0.600 0.2312 0.2312 0.8732 0.8732
2021-22 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 52 5 17 22 0.423 0.1630 0.1577 0.6157 0.5958
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC SR 30 0 1 1 0.033
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC JR 16 1 0 1 0.062
2023-24 Yale D1 ECAC SO 10 0 1 1 0.100
2022-23 Yale D1 ECAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6573
Defenseman overall
#1594
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Garrett Alberti
Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexander Babich
Trine · 2022-23
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Johanson
Trine · 2015-16
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.