← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Craig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-08-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 51 4 15 19 0.372 0.1119 0.1119 0.2550 0.2550
2020-21 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 20 3 6 9 0.450 0.1676 0.1676 0.6557 0.6557
2021-22 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 36 3 22 25 0.694 0.2587 0.2554 1.0118 0.9990
2022-23 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 54 10 38 48 0.889 0.3311 0.3107 1.2952 1.2153
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 26 3 10 13 0.500
2024-25 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 35 5 19 24 0.686
2023-24 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 39 0 10 10 0.256
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2023-24 · Robert Morris
-5.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3741
Defenseman overall
#1007
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.