IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Karnish Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 40 6 6 12 0.300 0.1844 0.1872 0.8839 0.8975
2022-23 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 16 0 5 5 0.312 0.1921 0.1851 0.9207 0.8870
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 20 6 0 6 0.300
2024-25 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 29 1 2 3 0.103
2023-24 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 27 3 1 4 0.148
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2023-24 · Princeton
-7.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29932
Forward overall
#1744
Forward born in 2003
#2844
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Noel Lortie
Elmira · 2004-05
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Storzuk
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Selleck
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.