IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-08-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Merritt Centennials BCHL 19 0 3 3 0.158 0.0588 0.0588 0.2301 0.2301
2021-22 Merritt Centennials BCHL 54 1 20 21 0.389 0.1449 0.1499 0.5667 0.5862
2022-23 — BCHL 54 6 27 33 0.611 0.2276 0.2243 0.8904 0.8774
2023-24 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 52 7 39 46 0.885 0.3295 0.3096 1.2890 1.2111
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT D1 AHA — 35 1 14 15 0.429
2024-25 RIT D1 AHA — 33 2 13 15 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2024-25 · RIT
+74.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4205
Defenseman overall
#1067
Defenseman born in 2003
#1123
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michel Bond
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Eruzione
Salve Regina · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Mueller
Fredonia · 2008-09
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.