IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Peters Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-10-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Wayzata USHS-MN 26 2 7 9 0.346 0.0932 0.0932 0.0841 0.0841
2020-21 Wayzata USHS-MN 21 4 18 22 1.048 0.2820 0.2820 — —
2021-22 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 58 0 11 11 0.190 0.1166 0.1139 0.5589 0.5459
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 CCHA SR 20 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 St. Thomas D1 CCHA — 36 1 4 5 0.139
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · St. Thomas
-18.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9343
Defenseman overall
#2042
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amedeo Mastrangeli
Elmira · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Kearney
Suffolk · 2023-24
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Nelson
Bowdoin · 2001-02
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.