← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaiah Norlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 26 5 24 29 1.115 0.1412 0.1412 0.2709 0.2709
2020-21 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 19 6 16 22 1.158 0.1466 0.1466 0.2813 0.2813
2021-22 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 38 2 11 13 0.342 0.1318 0.1344 0.4979 0.5078
2022-23 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 54 6 38 44 0.815 0.3139 0.3048 1.1858 1.1513
2023-24 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 51 12 36 48 0.941 0.3626 0.3354 1.3697 1.2670
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 37 8 20 28 0.757
2024-25 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 16 0 1 1 0.062
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2024-25 · Nebraska Omaha
-79.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3577
Defenseman overall
#877
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.