← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landen Hilditch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-08-17 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Surrey Eagles BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 BCHL 38 0 9 9 0.237 0.0882 0.0959 0.3450 0.3750
2023-24 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 51 3 12 15 0.294 0.1096 0.1141 0.4285 0.4462
2024-25 BCHL 24 0 2 2 0.083 0.0310 0.0307 0.1214 0.1203
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RPI D1 ECAC FR 17 0 1 1 0.059
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2025-26 · RPI
-2.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22360
Defenseman overall
#3713
Defenseman born in 2005
#3412
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2009-10
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2015-16
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2011-12
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.