IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grant Telfer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-08-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Nepean Raiders CCHL 61 7 22 29 0.475 0.1031 0.1003 0.3678 0.3579
2010-11 Nepean Raiders CCHL 61 10 23 33 0.541 0.1173 0.1083 0.4186 0.3867
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 26 2 4 6 0.231
2013-14 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 21 1 1 2 0.095
2012-13 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 10 0 3 3 0.300
2011-12 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 20 2 3 5 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2011-12 · Adrian
+152.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9490
Defenseman overall
#1240
Defenseman born in 1990
#812
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Raphael Lajeunesse
Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Walk
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Gates
Concordia · 2010-11
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.