IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Raphael Lajeunesse Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0434 0.0434 0.1532 0.1532
2020-21 Hearst Lumberjacks NOJHL 12 4 2 6 0.500 0.0852 0.0852 0.2119 0.2119
2021-22 Hearst Lumberjacks NOJHL 45 22 37 59 1.311 0.2233 0.2067 0.5556 0.5144
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Southern Maine D3 NEHC FR 17 2 3 5 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2022-23 · Southern Maine
+66.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22680
Forward overall
#1137
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

C.J. Stubbs
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Reid Watson
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincenzo Renda
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.