IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brock Cummings Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 25 3 6 9 0.360 0.0713 0.0713 0.1640 0.1640
2022-23 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 30 8 29 37 1.233 0.2443 0.2443 0.5619 0.5619
2023-24 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 54 16 18 34 0.630 0.2426 0.2477 0.9163 0.9357
2024-25 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 50 20 25 45 0.900 0.3468 0.3367 1.3098 1.2716
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 35 4 6 10 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2025-26 · Dartmouth
+10.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15420
Forward overall
#794
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Resch
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Inger
New England College · 2016-17
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Murfitt
Manhattanville · 2002-03
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.