| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | Mississauga IceDogs | OHL | 68 | 34 | 58 | 92 | 1.353 | 0.7851 | 0.8554 | 3.4668 | 3.7772 |
| 2002-03 | Mississauga IceDogs | OHL | 56 | 40 | 41 | 81 | 1.446 | 0.8393 | 0.8737 | 3.7064 | 3.8583 |
| 2003-04 | Mississauga IceDogs | OHL | 53 | 43 | 39 | 82 | 1.547 | 0.8978 | 0.8862 | 3.9647 | 3.9136 |
| 2004-05 | Mississauga IceDogs | OHL | 57 | 31 | 59 | 90 | 1.579 | 0.9162 | 0.8568 | 4.0459 | 3.7834 |
| 2012-13 | HIFK | Liiga | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.500 | 1.2500 | 1.1801 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | UMass Boston | D3 | — | FR | 21 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.238 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.