← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Smith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-03-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Aurora Tigers OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Aurora Tigers OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 24 0 4 4 0.167 0.1025 0.1022 0.4911 0.4899
2022-23 USHL 57 3 11 14 0.246 0.1510 0.1428 0.7236 0.6842
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio State D1 BigTen 37 4 8 12 0.324
2024-25 Ohio State D1 BigTen 36 3 3 6 0.167
2023-24 Ohio State D1 BigTen 32 1 4 5 0.156
2019-20 Assumption D1 SO 25 4 5 9 0.360
2018-19 Assumption D1 FR 11 0 3 3 0.273

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9850
Defenseman overall
#2155
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2006-07
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.