← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Menghini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 16 2 1 3 0.188 0.1153 0.1132 0.5524 0.5422
2022-23 Fargo Force USHL 58 21 15 36 0.621 0.3815 0.3546 1.8287 1.7000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 35 5 7 12 0.343
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen 34 12 7 19 0.559
2024-25 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 35 12 7 19 0.543
2023-24 Minnesota D1 BigTen 37 8 2 10 0.270
2023-24 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 37 8 2 10 0.270
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2023-24 · Minnesota
+22.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17104
Forward overall
#910
Forward born in 2002
#1714
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2007-08
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2015-16
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.