IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kazimier Sobieski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.3074 0.3226 1.4731 1.5460
2022-23 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 54 4 4 8 0.148 0.0910 0.0908 0.4363 0.4352
2023-24 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 48 4 20 24 0.500 0.3074 0.2914 1.4731 1.3963
2024-25 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 38 8 19 27 0.711 0.4367 0.3916 2.0933 1.8773
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RPI D1 ECAC — 35 5 7 12 0.343
2024-25 UMass D1 HockeyEast — 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2742
Defenseman overall
#659
Defenseman born in 2004
#1406
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rick Cleaver
Norwich · 2003-04
1.235 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor McCloy
Adrian · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Collin Patterson
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.