IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kazimier Sobieski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.2949 0.3095 1.5004 1.5747
2022-23 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 54 4 4 8 0.148 0.0874 0.0872 0.4444 0.4433
2023-24 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 48 4 20 24 0.500 0.2949 0.2795 1.5004 1.4222
2024-25 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 38 8 19 27 0.711 0.4191 0.3759 2.1320 1.9120
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 RPI D1 ECAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 RPI D1 ECAC — 35 5 7 12 0.343
2024-25 UMass D1 HockeyEast — 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2964
Defenseman overall
#711
Defenseman born in 2004
#1578
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Melso
SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake McAlpine
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Master
Stevenson · 2018-19
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.