| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Bow Valley Eagles | AJHL | 62 | 34 | 70 | 104 | 1.677 | 0.5626 | 0.5719 | 1.5523 | 1.5780 |
| 2001-02 | Canmore Eagles | AJHL | 62 | 43 | 64 | 107 | 1.726 | 0.5788 | 0.5640 | 1.5971 | 1.5562 |
| 2002-03 | Canmore Eagles | AJHL | 64 | 46 | 68 | 114 | 1.781 | 0.5974 | 0.5611 | 1.6483 | 1.5480 |
| 2010-11 | Metallurg Novokuznetsk | KHL | 54 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 0.481 | 1.2037 | 1.1498 | 6.6344 | 6.3372 |
| 2011-12 | Lukko | Liiga | 60 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 0.467 | 1.1667 | 0.9871 | 4.0118 | 3.3943 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Ferris State | D1 | CCHA | SO | 39 | 7 | 16 | 23 | 0.590 |
| 2003-04 | Ferris State | D1 | CCHA | FR | 37 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 0.486 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.