← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Willson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-15 Country: USA
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Omaha Lancers USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 56 3 13 16 0.286 0.1685 0.1766 0.8581 0.8992
2023-24 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 60 4 9 13 0.217 0.1278 0.1276 0.6508 0.6497
2024-25 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 29 3 3 6 0.207 0.1221 0.1157 0.6214 0.5886
2025-26 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 57 12 35 47 0.825 0.4864 0.4372 2.4766 2.2262
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3209
Defenseman overall
#828
Defenseman born in 2005
#1546
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2023-24
0.31
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
NAHL 2016-17
0.06
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
USHL 2023-24
0.19
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
USHL 2016-17
0.35
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2024-25
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2015-16
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.