IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gvido Jansons Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-10 Country: Latvia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 47 7 13 20 0.425 0.1563 0.1600 0.4491 0.4599
2016-17 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 54 19 27 46 0.852 0.3130 0.3035 0.8992 0.8719
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Arizona State D1 NCHC SR 26 0 2 2 0.077
2019-20 Arizona State D1 NCHC JR 23 2 2 4 0.174
2018-19 Arizona State D1 NCHC SO 35 1 2 3 0.086
2017-18 Arizona State D1 NCHC FR 34 2 0 2 0.059
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2017-18 · Arizona State
-74.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3864
Defenseman overall
#842
Defenseman born in 1997
#1163
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jory McWilliams
Bethel · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Chance Gorman
Elmira · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Jobb
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.