IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Brisson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Chicago Steel USHL 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Chicago Steel USHL 55 3 6 9 0.164 0.0965 0.0945 0.4909 0.4807
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 52 9 10 19 0.365 0.2155 0.2003 1.0965 1.0194
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Colorado College D1 NCHC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33133
Forward overall
#1996
Forward born in 2003
#3263
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Guzzo
Curry · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Sleeth
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Hutton
Concordia · 2012-13
0.867 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.