← New Search ↗ Social Card

Verner Miettinen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-07 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kiekko-Espoo U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 49 14 22 36 0.735 0.3982 0.3982 1.1111 1.1111
2020-21 Kiekko-Espoo U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 19 7 3 10 0.526 0.2853 0.2853 0.7959 0.7959
2021-22 Kiekko-Espoo U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 35 11 20 31 0.886 0.4800 0.4912 1.3394 1.3706
2022-23 Fargo Force USHL 51 17 17 34 0.667 0.3933 0.3724 2.0024 1.8958
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 27 4 8 12 0.444
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 36 8 13 21 0.583
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SO 38 4 19 23 0.605
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2023-24 · St. Cloud State
+68.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9087
Forward overall
#385
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2013-14
1.536 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2018-19
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.