IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Klavs Veinbergs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-27 Country: Latvia
2022 · Round 7, Pick #224  ·  Tampa Bay Lightning Tampa Bay Lightning
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — MHL-RU 47 16 8 24 0.511 0.2597 0.2585 1.3682 1.3618
2022-23 — USHL 50 12 16 28 0.560 0.3303 0.3122 1.6819 1.5898
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colorado College D1 NCHC JR 36 11 12 23 0.639
2024-25 Colorado College D1 NCHC JR 36 9 10 19 0.528
2023-24 Colorado College D1 NCHC SO 19 4 6 10 0.526
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2023-24 · Colorado College
+111.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12572
Forward overall
#583
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Beau Moyer
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Hudson
Manhattanville · 2007-08
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonny Mulera
Salve Regina · 2018-19
1.409 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.