| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Sherwood Park Crusaders | AJHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2007-08 | Sherwood Park Crusaders | AJHL | 51 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 0.471 | 0.1578 | 0.1691 | 0.4362 | 0.4676 |
| 2008-09 | Sherwood Park Crusaders | AJHL | 61 | 25 | 33 | 58 | 0.951 | 0.3189 | 0.3286 | 0.8812 | 0.9079 |
| 2009-10 | Sherwood Park Crusaders | AJHL | 51 | 44 | 43 | 87 | 1.706 | 0.5722 | 0.5602 | 1.5810 | 1.5480 |
| 2017-18 | SaiPa | Liiga | 51 | 12 | 18 | 30 | 0.588 | 1.4705 | 1.3602 | — | — |
| 2018-19 | SaiPa | Liiga | 55 | 14 | 23 | 37 | 0.673 | 1.6817 | 1.4928 | — | — |
| 2019-20 | HPK | Liiga | 59 | 10 | 39 | 49 | 0.831 | 2.0762 | 2.0762 | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Kärpät | Liiga | 53 | 15 | 27 | 42 | 0.792 | 1.9812 | 1.9812 | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Barys Astana | KHL | 33 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 0.424 | 1.0605 | 0.8285 | — | — |
| 2022-23 | Kärpät | Liiga | 60 | 10 | 23 | 33 | 0.550 | 1.3750 | 0.9235 | — | — |
| 2023-24 | Löwen Frankfurt | DEL | 52 | 17 | 24 | 41 | 0.788 | 1.9712 | 1.4869 | — | — |
| 2024-25 | Augsburger Panther | DEL | 34 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 0.647 | 1.6178 | 1.1460 | — | — |
| 2025-26 | Augsburger Panther | DEL | 51 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 0.588 | 1.4705 | 1.1105 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Alaska Fairbanks | D1 | WCHA | SR | 37 | 22 | 21 | 43 | 1.162 |
| 2012-13 | Alaska Fairbanks | D1 | — | JR | 37 | 11 | 17 | 28 | 0.757 |
| 2011-12 | Alaska Fairbanks | D1 | — | SO | 36 | 15 | 17 | 32 | 0.889 |
| 2010-11 | Alaska Fairbanks | D1 | — | FR | 38 | 12 | 18 | 30 | 0.789 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.