← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Powell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-02 Country: USA
2024 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #148  ·  Philadelphia Flyers Philadelphia Flyers
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 USHL 53 8 11 19 0.358 0.2204 0.2288 1.0562 1.0964
2023-24 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 61 43 31 74 1.213 0.7457 0.7371 3.5740 3.5326
2024-25 Oshawa Generals OHL 28 9 13 22 0.786 0.4559 0.4269 2.0134 1.8853
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State D1 NCHC SO 34 7 5 12 0.353
2024-25 Ohio State D1 BigTen 17 2 3 5 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.50
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2024-25 · Ohio State
-40.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2003-04
1.235 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.