IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Powell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-02 Country: USA
2024 · Round 5, Pick #148  ·  Philadelphia Flyers Philadelphia Flyers
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 — USHL 53 8 11 19 0.358 0.2115 0.2195 1.0767 1.1177
2023-24 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 61 43 31 74 1.213 0.7156 0.7073 3.6434 3.6011
2024-25 Oshawa Generals OHL 28 9 13 22 0.786 0.4545 0.4256 2.0189 1.8905
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State D1 NCHC SO 34 7 5 12 0.353
2024-25 Ohio State D1 BigTen — 17 2 3 5 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2024-25 · Ohio State
-38.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Michael Vecchione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor McCloy
Adrian · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mathew Thompson
Adrian · 2013-14
1.536 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Collin Patterson
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.