← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-07-06 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
EHC Freiburg · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 8 4 0 4 0.500 0.1677 0.1808 0.4634 0.4997
2008-09 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 49 15 15 30 0.612 0.2053 0.2128 0.5674 0.5882
2009-10 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 58 25 26 51 0.879 0.2949 0.2906 0.8149 0.8031
2010-11 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 49 21 23 44 0.898 0.3012 0.2810 0.8323 0.7765
2017-18 Eispiraten Crimmitschau DEL2 29 12 13 25 0.862 1.1549 1.2454
2019-20 EHC Freiburg DEL2 48 22 26 48 1.000 1.3396 1.3396
2020-21 EHC Freiburg DEL2 43 26 29 55 1.279 1.7135 1.7135
2021-22 EHC Freiburg DEL2 39 16 17 33 0.846 1.1336 0.9641
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SR 32 8 8 16 0.500
2013-14 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 33 17 14 31 0.939
2012-13 Alaska Anchorage D1 SO 36 12 7 19 0.528
2011-12 Alaska Anchorage D1 FR 28 3 6 9 0.321
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2011-12 · Alaska Anchorage
+31.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7236
Forward overall
#309
Forward born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2005-06
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2018-19
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.