IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corban Knight Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-09-10 Country: Canada
2009 · Round 5, Pick #135  ·  Florida Panthers Florida Panthers
Signed Professionally
Avangard Omsk · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0838 0.0911 0.2314 0.2516
2008-09 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 61 34 38 72 1.180 0.3959 0.4140 1.0922 1.1421
2019-20 Barys Astana KHL 60 20 20 40 0.667 1.6667 1.6667 9.1863 9.1863
2020-21 Avangard Omsk KHL 57 18 22 40 0.702 1.7545 1.7545 9.6699 9.6699
2021-22 Avangard Omsk KHL 47 18 30 48 1.021 2.5533 2.0342 14.0722 11.2113
2022-23 Avangard Omsk KHL 58 15 19 34 0.586 1.4655 1.0500 8.0771 5.7871
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 North Dakota D1 WCHA-orig SR 41 16 33 49 1.195
2011-12 North Dakota D1 WCHA-orig JR 39 16 24 40 1.026
2010-11 North Dakota D1 WCHA-orig SO 44 14 30 44 1.000
2009-10 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 37 6 7 13 0.351
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2009-10 · North Dakota
+44.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#153
Forward overall
#7
Forward born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.