← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Jardine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-08-12 Country: Canada
2011 · Round 6, Pick #169  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
Signed Professionally
HIFK · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 50 6 16 22 0.440 0.1476 0.1606 0.4072 0.4431
2011-12 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 51 11 19 30 0.588 0.1973 0.2047 0.5443 0.5646
2021-22 HIFK Liiga 21 2 3 5 0.238 0.5953 0.5092 2.0467 1.7507
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 33 2 10 12 0.364
2013-14 Ohio State D1 BigTen SO 36 1 12 13 0.361
2012-13 Ohio State D1 CCHA-orig FR 28 0 7 7 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2012-13 · Ohio State
+41.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2199
Defenseman overall
#418
Defenseman born in 1993

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2016-17
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2006-07
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2004-05
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.