| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Camrose Kodiaks | AJHL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Camrose Kodiaks | AJHL | 50 | 6 | 16 | 22 | 0.440 | 0.1476 | 0.1606 | 0.4072 | 0.4431 |
| 2011-12 | Camrose Kodiaks | AJHL | 51 | 11 | 19 | 30 | 0.588 | 0.1973 | 0.2047 | 0.5443 | 0.5646 |
| 2021-22 | HIFK | Liiga | 21 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.238 | 0.5953 | 0.5092 | 2.0467 | 1.7507 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Ohio State | D1 | BigTen | JR | 33 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 0.364 |
| 2013-14 | Ohio State | D1 | BigTen | SO | 36 | 1 | 12 | 13 | 0.361 |
| 2012-13 | Ohio State | D1 | CCHA-orig | FR | 28 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.250 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.