IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Williamson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-09-05 Country: Canada
2013 · Round 6, Pick #175  ·  Vancouver Canucks Vancouver Canucks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 41 9 9 18 0.439 0.1472 0.1532 0.4063 0.4228
2012-13 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 23 1 10 11 0.478 0.1604 0.1587 0.4426 0.4379
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2014-15 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 16 1 1 2 0.125
2013-14 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 27 2 4 6 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2013-14 · Penn State
+50.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10533
Defenseman overall
#1285
Defenseman born in 1993
#1275
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan McKenna
Connecticut College · 2023-24
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Dunaiski
Concordia · 2023-24
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Altenbernd
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.