← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Skahan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-05-14 Country: USA
2024 · Round 3, Pick #65  ·  Utah Hockey Club Utah Hockey Club
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 St. Thomas Academy USHS-MN 26 11 12 23 0.885 0.1120 0.1120 0.2149 0.2149
2022-23 NTDP-U18 60 1 10 11 0.183 0.1362 0.1399 0.6840 0.7025
2023-24 NTDP-U18 60 5 9 14 0.233 0.1734 0.1692 0.8705 0.8493
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HockeyEast SO 31 1 0 1 0.032
2024-25 Boston College D1 HockeyEast 30 2 5 7 0.233
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2024-25 · Boston College
+56.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10860
Defenseman overall
#2132
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2010-11
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.